The implicit suggestion is that the logic of the italicized exception does not vitiate the logic of Cardozo’s general claim. But that suggestion plainly calls out for explanation and defense. If willfully harmful actions may render a tortfeasor liable for harm to an unforeseeable victim, one wishes to know, why not negligently harmful actions? If a tortfeasor cannot owe a duty against careless injury to an unforeseeable victim, how can a tortfeasor owe a duty against intentional injury to an unforeseeable victim? Absent some plausible explanation of this asymmetry, consistency would appear to require dispensing with the doctrine of transferred intent or renouncing the relationship between foreseeability and negligence liability that Cardozo posited. And nothing in the passage attempts to supply the needed explanation.
Момент удара ракеты по спутниковой станции в Израиле попал на видео20:56，这一点在雷电模拟器中也有详细论述
，更多细节参见谷歌
Россиян предупредили о смертельной опасности лечения простуды алкоголем14:41。PG官网对此有专业解读
Момент удара ракеты по спутниковой станции в Израиле попал на видео20:56