There does not obviously exist any coherent, consistent, and reflectively plausible set of moral principles that implies that the agent should be liable in the first scenario but not in the second.279 And, if we attempt to iron out the inconsistency so as to produce consistent moral and legal principles, we may well produce a fearfully broad account of the conditions of strict remedial liability (under which we are strictly liable to compensate for the vast majority of the injurious consequences of our actions, far more often than almost all of us assume and far more often than the law currently holds us liable280) or else an implausibly anemic account, according to which we are hardly ever strictly liable to compensate for such consequences.281 Some tort theorists have adopted such revisionary normative accounts in an attempt to follow principled consistency where it leads. But ordinary moral intuition and tort doctrine both balk at following in their steps.
于东来公布胖东来 40 亿元分配细则：不要再猜想了
。safew对此有专业解读
3014507610http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pc/content/202603/13/content_30145076.htmlhttp://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pad/content/202603/13/content_30145076.html11921 第十四届全国人民代表大会第四次会议关于最高人民法院工作报告的决议，详情可参考谷歌
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用，详情可参考超级权重