That principle asserts that innovations only truly catch on when two factors connect: One, the new thing works reliably, and two, people understand why they need it. Simply creating a cool new technology is never enough; fail to bring the public along, and you wind up with either weak demand (think Segway) or a backlash (like with nuclear power in the 1980s).
具体的时间可能还没有办法给出完全的判断，1—3年是大师兄给出的判断，我们的判断是如果按每一天迭代的速度比前一天快，看到整个训练速度和数据规模曲线是加速上升的状态，如果我们一直维持这个状态的话，我相信会很快。
。业内人士推荐币安_币安注册_币安下载作为进阶阅读
Зеленский пытался поднять в интервью острую тему и был прерванДмитриев: Интервьюер перебил Зеленского, затронувшего тему ядерного оружия
To summarize, MIM shares the dependency-inversion concept with Clean/Hexagonal/Onion Architectures. But MIM also proposes approaches that can be applied to the gray areas in the overall design process developers need to address to complete the project. Also this application architecture is less prescriptive, thus more universal. Of course, there are many successful projects with e.g. Hexagonal or Clean/Onion Architectures, but in most cases I’ve seen the designers had to first address the ambiguities and unanswered questions themselves in order to succeed. For small projects, a design typical of Hexagonal Architecture (or maybe even Clean Architecture) might be better. At least as long as it stays small.